FBI stond in 2017 op het punt een staatsgreep te plegen in de VS (krapuul.nl)

@49
[@47 En dit heeft er al helemaal niks mee te maken.]

Hoezo niet? Dat lijkt me niet slechts meer dan voldoende grond om hem onmiddellijk uit het Witte Huis te trappen, maar ook om hem voor de rest van zijn leven naar een werkkamp in Siberië te sturen. En dan bedoel ik niet om daar een trumptoren neer te zetten.

@50 Welnee joh, er komt een dag dat Trump samen met ‘zijn’ GOP luid kunnen meezingen op ‘we will all go down together’. De handel en wandel van the Don cum suis zorgt daar wel zelf voor.

@52
Wat je nu ziet in het fake news en bij figuren als McCabe wordt een 'death cat bounce' genoemd.

Er zijn al vele voorbeelden van fase III, ik ga ze niet allemaal posten: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/feb/16/senate-panel-probing-meetings-between-russians-and/

@33
Voor een zelfbenoemde expert van de Amerikaanse politiek ben je slecht op de hoogte.

Dat geeft waarschijnlijk ook het niveau van al je andere reacties aan.
Trol

@42
Bevestig je nog even dat het klopt?

https://www.businessinsider.nl/de-meeste-amerikanen-stemden-op-hillary-clinton-toch-won-donald-trump-want-het-gaat-om-de-kiesmannen/

Het dead cat bounce effect is, zoals reeds gesteld in @52 van toepassing op Trump en de GOP zonder scrupules.

@54
Ocherm, ben je op je npc teentjes getrapt.

@55
Precies, de populist / globalist Clinton en het hele corrupte zootje heeft verloren van iemand die de macht weer aan het volk wil geven en de constitutionele republiek zal herstellen.

@56
Zoals jij, ten onrechte beweerde.

@57
Je trollen status weer eens bevestigend, door helemaal niet op de inhoud in te gaan.

@49 https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/feb/08/rosenstein-did-not-want-to-write-memo-justifying-comey-firing-new-book

@49

Iets wat nooit gebeurde kun je niet vergeten.

Working from interviews with Jim Comey and Inspector General Horowitz's first report on Comey—the second is still forthcoming—I've written extensively about how a faction of rogue FBI agents in the NYC field office threatened illegal leaks until Comey reopened Clinton's case.I've written of how these rogue agents (a) used former Trump attorney—and current attorney for multiple Trump aides—Joe DiGenova to illegally leak to the media and threaten Comey via media, and (b) used Trump adviser Rudy Giuliani likewise to leak to media and threaten Comey. I've written of how these rogue agents, in conjunction with rogue NYPD officers—including, it appears, the man running the Weiner investigation, who donated to Trump's campaign in October 2016—leaked false info and/or coordinated false leaks with top Trump adviser Erik Prince.The question has always been how much Trump knew of what his advisers Giuliani, Prince, and DiGenova were doing to make contact with rogue FBI and NYPD officials, facilitate their illegal pre-election leaks to media, and use those leaks and a threat of more to blackmail Comey. This was critical because those illegal leaks were, per IG Horowitz, a major consideration in Comey reopening Clinton's case—a decision that, per polling data, gave Trump the presidential election. If Trump knew of these crimes, he was part of a conspiracy that made him POTUS.

Dit zijn tweets van Seth Abramson schrijver van het boek proof of Collusion, echt heel informatief, dit zijn de eerste 5 er zijn er 45 over het interview van Mccabe.

Barr to Mueller:
“Bob, show me the evidence and reasoning for why this investigation was started and still ongoing.”
Mueller to Bart:
“With regards to the President we have found no links or ties to any foreign entity etc”
Barr to Mueller:
“Mandate was clear – verify and investigate reports of possible foreign collusion between President & Russia.” “What justification existed to effectively launch a massive domestic / foreign surv campaign against the President (pres elect / president) and members of his transition / campaign team?”
Mueller to Barr:
“Steele dossier along w/ media corroboration of those findings.”
Barr to Mueller:
“Was the Steele report a ‘trusted and verified’ report per Intel to continue especially considering the funding party was the opposition party?”
Mueller to Barr:
“Those facts were never taken into consideration.” “FISC granted auth to conduct based on conclusions presented.”
Barr to Mueller:
“Was FISC made aware of all details surrounding the dossier?”
Mueller to Barr:
“No.” “We believe there was urgency placed on the auth given the gravity and timeline of events that those involved negated to populate fully.”
Barr to Mueller:
“Why were efforts made to continue investigating the President, interrupt his official capacity in governing, if the only doc presented was unsubstantiated and unverified?” “Why were questions and threat of subpoena communicated to the President if no factual foundation existed?”
“All charges thus far are unrelated to the original mandate – why are you still active and pursuing a crime if no verifiable evidence or evidence through discovery exists?”
Barr to RR:
“What justification did you have to effectively expand the mandate, not report that expansion to Congress, in order to seek a crime outside of R collusion?” “What specific reasoning and/or facts existed to justify the appointment of a SC to begin with per the law?” “Why did you recommend to Sessions that he should recuse?” “Why wasn’t the mandate / budget and regular updates provided to Congress upon request?” “Why is everything kept confidential and under inappropriate classification?” “Was the purpose of investigating to find a crime vs investigate evidence of a crime?”

@63 Een linkje was ook voldoende geweest. Kun je dat alsnog geven?

[quote]
REMEMBER Andy McCabe: -Lied 3 times to the FBI and fired -Referred for criminal prosecution -Was part of the plot to use the Dossier against the President Still zero evidence of Russian collusion. Lots of evidence that Andy McCabe is untrustworthy and politicized the FBI. (1/3)

McCabe is not trustworthy, but still remarkable he’s the 3rd person to say there was a plot inside the DOJ to remove the President from office. (2/3)

TV interviews are nice, but we need Rod Rosenstein and Andy McCabe to appear, under oath, in front of the Oversight Committee—the American people deserve the truth. (3/3)
[/quote]

Belangrijk puntje, belicht door de Donald:

[quote]
Remember this, Andrew McCabe didn’t go to the bathroom without the approval of Leakin’ James Comey!
[/quote]

Bommetje, McConnell en Ryan wisten er van af:

Er was een derde dossier (Bruce - Nellie Ohr / Steele / fusiongps - belangenverstrengeling.
Comey heeft Baker, die Clinton wilde vervolgen, tegengehouden.
Mueller rapport kan volgende week al klaar zijn.